Some iconic World Heritage glaciers will disappear by 2050

New UNESCO data highlight the accelerated melting of glaciers in World Heritage sites, with glaciers in a third of sites set to disappear by 2050. But it is still possible to save the other two thirds, if the rise in global temperatures does not exceed 1.5°C compared to the pre-industrial period. This will be a major challenge for COP27.

Some iconic World Heritage glaciers will disappear by 2050
by Bruno Oberle (IUCN Director General)
(published on unesco.org, November 3rd 2022)

50 UNESCO World Heritage sites are home to glaciers (A total of 18,600 glaciers have been identified in these 50 sites, covering around 66,000 km2), representing almost 10% of the Earth’s total glacierized area.

They include the highest (next to Mt. Everest), the longest (in Alaska), and the last remaining glaciers in Africa, amongst others, giving a representative overview of the general situation of glaciers in the world.

Foto: UNESCO / Mark Kelley

But a new study by UNESCO, in partnership with IUCN, shows these glaciers have been retreating at an accelerated rate since 2000 due to CO2 emissions, which are warming temperatures.

They are currently losing 58 billion tons of ice every year – equivalent to the combined annual water use of France and Spain– and are responsible for nearly 5% of observed global sea-level rise.

Only one effective solution: quickly reduce CO2 emissions.

The report concludes that glaciers in a third of the 50 World Heritage sites are condemned to disappear by 2050, regardless of efforts to limit temperature increases. But it is still possible to save the glaciers in the remaining two thirds of sites if the rise in temperatures does not exceed 1.5°C compared to the pre-industrial period.

This report is a call to action. Only a rapid reduction in our CO2 emissions levels can save glaciers and the exceptional biodiversity that depends on them. COP27 will have a crucial role to help find solutions to this issue. UNESCO is determined to support states in pursuing this goal (Audrey Azoulay – UNESCO Director-General)”.

Audrey Azoulay (UNESCO Director-General)

In addition to drastically reduced carbon emissions, UNESCO is advocating for the creation of an international fund for glacier monitoring and preservation. Such a fund would support comprehensive research, promote exchange networks between all stakeholders and implement early warning and disaster risk reduction measures.

Half of humanity depends directly or indirectly on glaciers as their water source for domestic use, agriculture, and power. Glaciers are also pillars of biodiversity, feeding many ecosystems.

When glaciers melt rapidly, millions of people face water scarcity and the increased risk of natural disasters such as flooding, and millions more may be displaced by the resulting rise in sea levels. This study highlights the urgent need to cut greenhouse gas emissions and invest in Nature-based Solutions, which can help mitigate climate change and allow people to better adapt to its impacts (Bruno Oberle, IUCN Director General)”.

Examples of endangered glaciers by region
Africa:
According to available data, glaciers in all World Heritage sites in Africa will very likely be gone by 2050, incl. Kilimanjaro National Park and Mount Kenya

Asia:
Glaciers in Three Parallel Rivers of Yunnan Protected Areas (China) – #1 highest mass loss relative to 2000 (57.2%) and also the fastest melting glacier on the List

Glaciers in Western Tien-Shan (Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Uzbekistan) have shrunk by 27% since 2000

Europe:
Glaciers in Pyrenees Mont Perdu (France, Spain) – very likely to disappear by 2050

Glaciers in The Dolomites (Italy) – very likely to disappear by 2050

Latin America:
Glaciers in Los Alerces National Park (Argentina) – #2 highest mass loss relative to 2000 (45.6%)

Glaciers in Huascaran National Park (Peru) have shrunk by 15% since 2000

North America:
Glaciers in Yellowstone National Park (United States of America) – very likely to disappear by 2050

Glaciers in Yosemite National Park (United States of America) – very likely to disappear by 2050

Glaciers in Waterton Glacier International Peace Park (Canada, United States of America) have lost 26.5% of their volume in 20 years

Oceania:
Glaciers in Te Wahipounamu – South West New Zealand (New Zealand) have lost almost 20% of their volume since 2000

UNESCO thanks IUCN, ETH Zurich, the Swiss Federal Institute for Forest, Snow and Landscape Research (WSL), and the Space Geophysics and Oceanography Studies Laboratory (LEGOS) of the French National Center for Scientific Research (CNRS) for their contribution to this study.

Resources to download
Full UNESCO report:  https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000383551

Note on the methodology
Glaciers in World Heritage sites have been identified by overlaying the delineation of sites with data from the Randolph Glacier Inventory (RGI) and Global Land Ice Measurements from Space (GLIMS) databases. These databases are among the most comprehensive inventories of glaciers worldwide and provide information (e.g. glacier geometry, glacier area, snowlines, supraglacial lakes and rock debris, and other glacial attributes) for more than 200,000 glaciers. 

In the case of Yellowstone and its close vicinity, 8 glaciers (most probably very small ice patches) covering only 3km2 have been identified. The RGI and GLIMS databases are regularly updated so it could be that some of these glaciers or very small ice patches might have already disappeared, which comes to assert our projections.

Press contact
François Wibaux, f.wibaux@unesco.org, +33767015995

0
Some iconic World Heritage glaciers will disappear by 2050 ultima modifica: 2023-03-20T04:27:00+01:00 da GognaBlog

5 pensieri su “Some iconic World Heritage glaciers will disappear by 2050”

  1. 5
    Stefano says:

    Dal Great Reset che tanto Schwab sta propagandando (ma se avete visto un servizio della giornalista Fuori dal Coro lui lascia 24 h 24 l’auto accesa perchè deve trovarla calda) il ruolo chiave per la sovranita’ mondiale ce l’avra’ l’Onu. 
    Da qui tutte le sue propaggini quindi l’Unesco sono per la catastrofe ecologica e quindi tutto green perchè sanno che avranno le redini del mondo e quindi giu’ a raccontare la filastrocca per incantare i fessi. 
    Aggiungo questo poi…per chiarire meglio il mio discorso… https://twitter.com/LBasemi/status/1637836590411137024/photo/1

  2. 4
    Fabio Bertoncelli says:

    ———  LA  NUOVA  RELIGIONE  ———
     
    Ursula e c.: “Chi non è col green è contro il green”.
    Da bandire prossimamente dal consorzio umano.

  3. 3
    MG says:

    @Regattin. Concordo. e non è l’unico esempio. se le persone pensassero alle navi da crociera, alle auto e agli yacht  dei ricchi, ai jet privati, agli scarichi industriali e alla miriade di attività che inquinano, sporcano sprecano e consumano senza alcun ritegno e unicamente per il profitto o il piacere di pochi  si renderebbero conto della scemenza siderale  di sottostare a politiche restrittive sull’ammodernamento energetico delle case con costi lunari per i privati e per vantaggi dall’incidenza più che marginale  (ma che contribuiranno a impoverire e soggiogare la massa dei sempre meno abbienti…) che si ha la sfrontatezza di definire Green (che suona bene e politically correct).
     

  4. 2
    Luciano Regattin says:

    Un carrarmato consuma circa 4 litri di benzina a km. Hai voglia di romperci i maroni sul movimento sostenibile.

  5. 1
    Grazia Pitruzzella says:

    Vedo la riduzione delle emissioni come un’altra trappola del vivere “green”. Sarà solo tesa a tenerci a casa, non certo a salvare noi e il pianeta.

La lunghezza massima per i commenti è di 1500 caratteri.

Lascia un commento

Il tuo indirizzo email non sarà pubblicato. I campi obbligatori sono contrassegnati *

Questo sito usa Akismet per ridurre lo spam. Scopri come i tuoi dati vengono elaborati.